◢ SPACE MEDICINE FOUNDATION
⌕ Search
Space weather
Geomagnetic storm level: Loading…
Solar radiation level: Loading…
Loading…
ROUGH DRAFT SITE · Educational use only — not medical advice and not operational guidance. Disclaimer

Home › Research › Risk & Gap Atlas › Muscle & aerobic fitness

DRAFT · NOT REVIEWED — AI-assisted draft for educational use only; not medical advice and not operational guidance. It has not been reviewed by a medical or scientific reviewer. Evidence grades are proposals pending reviewer confirmation. Items marked “pending verification” could not be confirmed against a primary source. Disclaimer
RSK-12 · NASA human-system risk · Research

Muscle & aerobic fitness

Also: Reduced fitness risk

Gravity FieldsMusculoskeletalCardiovascularIn-flightEVA & Surface OpsPostflight RecoveryLEO long-durationLunar surfaceMars transit & surfacePublicClinicianResearcher

draft AI-assisted Last reviewed: Pending review · Reviewer: Pending review

Bottom line
  • About 600 minutes per week of exercise doesn't fully prevent deconditioning on 6-month missions, and individual responses vary widely. ◆◆◆◇ Moderate · F
  • Many astronauts aren't back to preflight fitness 30 days after landing. ◆◆◆◇ Moderate · F
  • For Mars, NASA rates this risk 5×4, requiring mitigation. ◆◆◆◆ High · E

Proposed certainty (◆ High → ◇ Very low) and evidence-type tags: F flight · A analog · M model/animal · C computational · E expert/operational/standards. AI-proposed, pending reviewer confirmation. How to read the grades.

NASA risk title (verbatim)

Risk of Mission Performance Decrements and Adverse Health Outcomes Resulting from Reduced Cardiorespiratory and Musculoskeletal Fitness

NASA short title: Muscle and Aerobic · HRP element: Human Health Countermeasures (HHC) · Status: Active [current research ongoing] [1]

What it is

This risk is about losing the heart, lung and muscle fitness needed for mission tasks such as spacewalks, emergency egress and surface exploration, and about long-term health effects [1].

Current evidence

  • Despite in-flight exercise, fitness falls during and after flight. People vary widely, and adherence doesn’t fully explain the differences [1].
  • Some ISS astronauts don’t meet fitness standards for weightless operations, and many wouldn’t meet the standards for surface spacewalks. Many aren’t back to preflight fitness by the end of the standard 30-day reconditioning program [1].
  • In 46 long-duration astronauts, about 600 minutes per week of aerobic and resistance exercise didn’t fully prevent multisystem deconditioning. Responses varied widely between individuals [4].
  • Peak aerobic capacity fell about 17% early in flight, then partly recovered [5].
  • In 4 crew members after about 6 months, calf muscle volume fell 10–16% and thigh volume 4–7% [6].
  • There are few data for missions longer than 4–6 months, for women, or for partial gravity. Exercise hardware will be smaller on exploration vehicles [1].

NASA’s risk posture

NASA scores each risk for each design reference mission (DRM) as likelihood × consequence (LxC). Both run from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) on the HSRB’s 5×5 matrix [1][3]. Each score comes with a disposition, such as “Accepted”, “Requires Characterization” or “Requires Mitigation”. These ratings were last approved by NASA’s Human System Risk Board (HSRB) in 4/2024 [1].

MissionDurationIn-mission (operations)Long-term health
LEOShort (under 30 d)5x1 · Accepted with Optimization3x1 · Accepted
LEOLong (30 d–1 yr)5x1 · Requires Characterization5x2 · Accepted with Optimization
Lunar orbitShort5x1 · Accepted with Optimization3x1 · Accepted
Lunar orbitLong5x1 · Requires Characterization5x2 · Accepted with Optimization
Lunar orbit + surfaceShort5x2 · Requires Characterization3x1 · Accepted with Optimization
Lunar orbit + surfaceLong5x3 · Requires Mitigation5x2 · Requires Characterization
Mars preparatoryUnder 1 yr5x2 · Requires Mitigation5x2 · Requires Characterization
Mars planetary730–1,224 d5x4 · Requires Mitigation5x3 · Requires Mitigation

NASA carries this as two HSRB risks, one for aerobic fitness and one for muscle; the HRR shows a combined rating [1].

Copied from the Human Research Roadmap on 2026-10-14. Ratings change. Check the live record before citing.

Open knowledge gaps

NASA lists 5 knowledge gaps for this risk, 4 of them open as of 2026-10-14 [1]. Each gap ID links to its page on the Human Research Roadmap (HRR).

Show NASA’s gap list (verbatim)
GapNASA gap statementStatus
MA-101Characterize the effects of the spaceflight environment, including reduced gravity (i.e., weightlessness, partial gravity), countermeasures, and individual variability, on physiological and functional measures of muscular and cardio-respiratory fitness and performance.Open
MA-102Determine the relationship between physiological and functional measures of muscular and cardio-respiratory fitness or performance and mission-specific task performance and crew health outcomes.Open
MA-201Determine the required exercise countermeasure or countermeasures (i.e., modality or modalities, prescription, monitoring) to protect mission-specific task performance and crew health outcomes.?
MA-202Determine whether adjunct or supplementary countermeasures (e.g., nutrition, pharmaceuticals, novel devices, sensorimotor training) improve the efficacy of the exercise countermeasures to protect mission-specific task performance and crew health outcomes.Open
MA-301Evaluate an integrated exercise countermeasure system(s) and the potential impact of other physiological countermeasure(s) to protect mission-specific task performance and crew health outcomes.Open

See also Open questions.

Active countermeasure research

  • New exercise systems. Novel exercise systems are being evaluated on the ISS, Orion and Gateway, and in analogs [1].
  • Task-specific fitness. Studies measure the metabolic cost and strength needed for spacewalk tasks to set fitness requirements (gaps MA-101 to MA-301) [1].

Project-level detail, including status, investigators and results, is in the NASA Task Book and on each HRR gap page.

Clinical articles

For practical, clinic-facing guidance, see:

Evidence profile
Overall certainty
◆◆◆◇ Moderate (proposed)
Evidence types
F · Flight dataE · Expert / operational / standards
Literature through
2026-10-14
NASA source
Human Research Roadmap risk page (last published 05/13/25; read 2026-10-14)
Requirements referenced 5
RequirementTitlePlain-language meaning
[V1 4001]–[V1 4002]EVA Aerobic CapacityMinimum VO2max for microgravity and surface EVAs.
[V1 4003]In-Mission Aerobic CapacityMaintain at least 80% of preflight VO2max.
[V1 4023]Muscle StrengthTable 4.6-1 minimum deadlift and bench press as multiples of body weight.
[V1 4024]In-Mission Muscle StrengthMaintain at least 80% of preflight strength.
[V2 7038]Physiological Countermeasures CapabilityVehicles must provide countermeasure capability (e.g., exercise hardware) to meet crew health standards.

IDs as published in NASA-STD-3001 Vol. 1 Rev C (2023-09-15) and NASA-STD-3001 Vol. 2 Rev F (2026-07-14). NASA-STD-3001 binds NASA programs; it is not a regulation for commercial flights. Paraphrased. Standards quick reference.

References 6
  1. NASA Human Research Roadmap. Risk record: “Risk of Mission Performance Decrements and Adverse Health Outcomes Resulting from Reduced Cardiorespiratory and Musculoskeletal Fitness”. Accessed 2026-10-14. humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/Risks/?i=180 NASA E
  2. NASA Human Research Program. Evidence report for the aerobic and muscle fitness risk (2024). humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/evidence/reports/Evidence%20re… NASA E
  3. Antonsen EL, et al. Updates to the NASA human system risk management process for space exploration. NPJ Microgravity. 2023;9:72. doi:10.1038/s41526-023-00305-z PMID:37679359 Peer-reviewed E
  4. Scott JM, et al. Effects of exercise countermeasures on multisystem function in long duration spaceflight astronauts. NPJ Microgravity. 2023;9:11. doi:10.1038/s41526-023-00256-5 PMID:36737441 Peer-reviewed F
  5. Moore AD Jr, et al. Peak exercise oxygen uptake during and following long-duration spaceflight. J Appl Physiol. 2014;117(3):231–238. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01251.2013 PMID:24970852 Peer-reviewed F
  6. Gopalakrishnan R, et al. Muscle volume, strength, endurance, and exercise loads during 6-month missions in space. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2010;81(2):91–102. doi:10.3357/ASEM.2583.2010 PMID:20131648 Peer-reviewed F

Machine-checked on 2026-10-14: each URL resolved, each DOI's title/journal/year matched via Crossref, and claims were checked against the source text (abstract or full NASA page). Human verification against full text is still required before review. NASA documents are U.S. Government works (public domain) and are summarized with attribution; journal articles are summarized, not reproduced.

Article info
Authors
Pending (AI-assisted draft)
Reviewer
Pending review
Last reviewed
Pending review
Literature through
2026-10-14
AI-assisted
Yes (disclosed)
COI
Pending
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Use
Educational only · Disclaimer
Cite this version
Pending first edition